Bills in Legislature to Affect Prison Time and Parole

Posted on Apr 28, 2010 in Legislation, National Issues

The Louisiana House of Representatives’ Criminal Justice Committee approved a group of bills that will help make it easier for nonviolent criminals to get out of jail earlier. The proposal of bills will now proceed to the full House, which has voted down similar proposals in the past.

House Bills 35, 64, 190, 194, 195, 918 and 947 can be found at

House Bill 35, proposed by Patricia Smith (D- Baton Rouge), calls for the parole eligibility of inmates over 60 years of age who have served over 10 years in prison. They would only be considered, however, if they did not commit a crime of violence or a sexual offense. Furthermore, they would have to meet the following conditions. First, they could not have committed a disciplinary offense in the last twelve months. Second, they must have completed a mandatory minimum of one hundred hours of pre-release programming. Third, the inmate must finish a substance abuse program if applicable. Fourth, the prisoner must complete his GED or be deemed incapable of doing so. Finally, he must carry a low-risk level designation.

House Bill 64, proposed by Smith also, calls for the removal of the authority of the parole board entirely. This would mean that all terms set down by judges would be served in their entirety. Some states such as Florida practice this.

House Bill 190, again proposed by Smith, mandates that parole board members meet certain qualifications to serve. These include a bachelor’s in criminal justice or a behavioral science and/or 5 or more years of experience and training in a similar field of work.

House Bill 194, proposed by Smith, offers a change in the accumulation of “good time” a prisoner can gain while in prison. What she proposes is that a nonviolent criminal receive a 30-day credit of “good time” for every 30 days that an inmate either performs his work or self-improvement activities, or both. Violent criminals would accumulate “good time” credit at a rate of 10 days of “good time” per 30 days of work or self-improvement.

House Bill 195, proposed by Fred H. Mills Jr., calls for a shift in the majority needed to receive approval from the parole board. Rather than complete unanimity, a prospective parolee could receive parole if he met all of the conditions previously listed in House Bill 35 and received a majority of the votes on the parole board.

House Bill 918, proposed by Smith, offers that non-violent criminals be given reduced sentences if they chose to attend rehabilitation programs

Finally, House Bill 947, proposed by Cederic Richmond, provides the foundation for the Board of Pardons and its relation to the Governor’s mansion.

  • Trice Green

    I disagree I think violent criminals should be awarded the same amount of goodtime as nonviolent criminals only if it’s their first offense. I do agree with early release for nonviolent criminals but not for repeat offenders or hibitual criminals.

  • fair is fair

    Fair is fair if u can give ppl coming to jail a chance then the ones in should be awarded the same oppourtunity. We all have made bad decisions that can’t b taken back but we can fix them if given a chance

  • Rene

    Quite difficult for those of us who were blessed with parents who raised us to become ethical moral citizens and provided educations which would allow us to provide for our families. There are those who were not so fortunate, they grew up on the streets, did not have a clue what it was like for anyone to love them so who would have taught them the difference in right and wrong. Much less provide them with an education. Yes, those are the ones who use drugs, sell drugs, hurt people and spend their life in and out of jail (sometimes out of desperation) I personally have a MBA, and live by the word of God, yet my husband is in jail. He had never been loved or given a chance, when we met (in church) and fell in love he was facing time for something he did in his past. Today he sits behind bars while I raise our children and live as though I am a married single mom. Embarrased, YES, because our legal system is corrupt. A person becomes branded when they are young and it the brand is permanant. Even when the person has changed! Put some people with life experience on the boards! I used to be a stuck up socialite who thought I was better than others because of the letters behind my name or the zeros on my check. WRONG! My husband is 1000000 times the person I was and he is incarcerated!

  • Tamara Marrero

    I agree, we all make mistakes and it seems to me that Louisiana has no faith in their own court and correctional system.

  • The Background Check helps to ensure that you keep your surroundings secure and secure to a fantastic extent. There are some people who may behave in a abnormal manner. These people need to be checked correctly so that it can be identified if they have been involved in criminal activities in the past. The government has a record of all the criminal activities and the individuals who performed them. The database contains the numerous info including the name of the person, the address, other private particulars. This indicates that they have some history of criminal past. All you have to do is to find if the particulars that you are entering are matching those that are already present in the database. If it matches, then you have a individual who has been involved in a criminal activity.

You Might Also Like:

(T) 504-599-9997 (f) 504-595-3208

Downtown location
  839 St. Charles Ave
  Suite 310

New Orleans, Louisiana

Contact Us